Get More Done With Less Gadgets
“Reflect often upon the rapidity with which all existing things, or things coming into existence, sweep past us and are carried away.”
Marcus Aurelius - Meditations
Those of us who write for a blog, also read blogs. If you are serious about writing and your blog, then it stands to reason, you must be curious about what other people are doing. Blogging is about disseminating information, banal and bromidic or original and worthwhile. One of the most prevalent blog topics is how to get more done in your alloted time on earth, while simplifying your life. Until recently I’ve been a sucker for this paradox of do more, get more, buy more, but simplify.
Like most people, I read only blogs that have particular interest to me. Any time I see that someone has come up with a better way to get something done, my curiosity is piqued. Many times this involves either more software or a gadget i.e more hardware. Either way, a new element has entered the scheme to simplify, and adds yet another level of attention distraction.
About a month ago I gave up using a PDA. I have had two different PDAs in the last five years, and although they are invaluable for carrying about large quantities of information, they are also a pain in the ass. Many times I need to enter information quickly, make a note for something, and I have never mastered a way to do that with a PDA. I went back to a pocket calendar and paper. I no longer have the 200 plus contacts, the PDF and Word documents, photos, and other information available, but I find I rarely use these anyway. And I store contacts on my cell phone, so there was some redundancy already built in.
Choice is a good thing, but how many text editors, sticky notes, and small calendars can you use. Again, I have gone to a simple paper notepad, even a slip of paper stuck in the calendar will do just fine. I rarely use real sticky notes; they are well, sticky, and only useful to me to stick on a paper for someone else to read. I never use them on the computer, digital or paper. There is not much more disgusting than a perfectly good LCD monitor plastered with sticky notes.
As a Mac user I find widgets useful, only if they perform a function I use often. Again, how many clocks, weather, calendars and other assorted clutter do I really need? Things such as package tracking, however, are quite useful. If I leave a note on one of the gazillion note widgets, chances are I will forget about it.
If you didn’t know that markets are created for new gadgets, you do now. Software is one of the best examples I can think of to illustrate this. Consider Microsoft Word®, the word processor. If you have been around for a while, you know that it has gone through numerous iterations, each purporting to improve productivity way beyond its predecessor. You also remember WordPerfect® for DOS. As a writer, WordPerfect was the best word processor I’ve ever used. It was stable and reliable. It did one thing and it did it well – it worked similar to a typewriter, and got your words in print, albeit digital.
Now, your Word, word-processor does almost everything, and redundancy rules your world. Are you really more productive with much of the newer software? Sometimes the answer is yes, sometimes no. Do you need to jump on the bandwagon and upgrade whenever a new version of Windows is released? Of course not. The greater point is, if what you have works well for you, keep it until you have a compelling reason to change.
I call this blog Hal, Deliberately Basic. My goal in life has always been to simplify and KISS. New toys can be fun, but somehow I always return to the basics. Make life easy, enjoy freedom from too many things that own you, and always work in moderation.
Related posts:
- 10 Reasons Not to BLOGAs of December 2007 Technorati was tracking 112 million BLOGs. What do the people who...
- Blogs Is Not ChatBlogs Explained From A to Z I have come to realize that the average non-techie...
- Enough With the Damned GadgetsQuiet Please Are we developing a country of people who are hyper-entertained? I often wonder...
- Six Months And Still BloggingYes, It Is Fun In a Strange Sort Of Way I just noticed that I've...
sablonneuse:
Quite alot of the gadjets/software you mentioned don’t mean much to me but I think I get what you mean.
June 2008I’ve still got a computer working on Windows 97!
Hb:
The irony of life, that so many others are thinking along this line of TMI (Too much information). I just read this LifeHacker post that addresses the very issue I wrote about.
http://lifehacker.com/396186/is-the-solution-to-tech-overload-more-tech
A NYT article addressed the problems that are the result of too much technology in business. And to my surprise, (it shouldn’t have surprised me) an entire blog is dedicated to getting away from the computer and other current tech gadgets.
The answer always lies somewhere in the middle.
There was Windows 95, Windows 98 and Windows 2000. Maybe you mean Word 97?
June 2008sablonneuse:
You’re right - it’s word 97! Told you I was pretty useless at computers.
June 2008Mari Adkins:
I’m still on Office 2003. One, due to finances. Two, 95% of my writerly friends have hated what MS did to Word when they ‘upgraded’ to ‘07 last year. The downside of all this is that Windows is notorious for refusing to be backward compatible with anything. I had to fight to get ‘03 to work with Vista on my laptop*, which, imho, shouldn’t have happened. Which leads me to my rant that MS needs to get what they HAVE working first before exploring other projects. But I’d say that goes for most people, too.
* trust me; the only reason I’m running vista is because the hardware isn’t backward compatible with xp. :this is where mari curses a blue streak:
June 2008Hal:
I feel your pain.
I worked as a network consultant for a number of years. Doing that I had to have not only a knowledge of Windows, but keep current as well. Windows has a monopoly on business (most business anyway),and this is just accepted. I got out of the business just as Vista was coming out. All I did was have a look and I knew I was not going with that OS. It reminds me of Windows ME - maybe the absolute worst OS ever perpetrated on the public. XP is/was the best OS ever to come from MS.
And this is why I use a Mac. I am not a zealot, don’t really care what other people do. But I always wonder why people don’t at least give something else a try. I don’t think money is the issue, if you think long term.
People used to constantly ask me for a recommendation to buy a new computer. I always said, get a Mac - an iMac is sufficient for most people. They cost too much was the usual reply. For an equivalent PC, I don’t think so. The big plus for a Mac is, you can use it for years without problems. You don’t have the inherent issues that come with a PC - viruses, and all sorts of malware that is generally accepted as a PC user.
Linux is another usable system anymore. Granted, not as easy as a Mac, but you can run Windows applications in Linux without much trouble.
I also don’t know why people use Office when open-source is available. OpenOffice is just as good if not better than MS Office, in my opinion of course.
The bottom line for me is, now that I don’t have to use MS crap, I don’t. I keep a PC around because on occasion I need one (only one) application (Dreamweaver) I don’t have on the Mac. It is available, but I don’t use it enough to warrant the cost.
June 2008