Archive for April 2008

HALDB Updated

Welcome to the new look of HALDB. If you are new to blogs, minimalism is the fashion. In keeping with the focus of this site, it fits well. Most people I know have been “on the web” for a number of years now, and they don’t visit web sites to see how pretty they are - they go to a site for information.

Of course a nice-looking, clean and well-organized site should be the goal of all site builders. As you wonder around in cyberspace, you will see some that are far too minimal, not enough info to find what you want. One of the worst things is no way to contact anyone.

Then there are sites (especially blogs) so filled with ads and links by the gross, you simply ignore everything and still go for the info you originally sought. We become immune to ads, and don’t care to sift through the multitudinous links, sometimes running down in columns on each side of the page.

Getting to the point is the point, or should be, of any site. Don’t make me hunt, else I’ll leave. Conversely, suppose your site is about photography. Show me pictures. Most of us who work or have worked building web sites know the basics.

Leave the moving, flashing, crawling, annoying pops and cracks to someone else. Animation is a 90s thing, and not usually good on a site. Everything has its place. A little something that moves on occasion may not be so bad, IF is enhances the site.

Since this site is about op-ed writing, you will not see many images. If I see one that makes sense, and adds value, common sense dictates that I use it.

That common sense thing keeps popping up, as it has all my life. If I could only master common sense, life would be so, well, basic and easier.

HB

Truth And Consequences

Roll up your sleeves, speak in mindless platitudes, and connect with the people. Tell the truth and get your ass whupped. What happened to truth and honor in this country? Take Senator Obama for example. Obama commented on the bitterness of working-class people in a speech at an expensive San Francisco fund-raiser. “They cling to guns,” said Obama, “or religion, or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them, or anti-immigrant sentiment, or anti-trade sentiment, as a way to explain their frustrations.” Christ, nearly any working stiff is bitter, and has been for years.

I don’t usually write about politics, but this is enough to make me want to vote. And for Obama at that. Someone finally speaks a truth, and gets nailed to the cross for it. Clinton and others have called for an apology from Obama. For what?

The claim is he is elitist, that he has talked down to the working class. This is double-speak for denying that we have a class system in this country. Class in the US has always been here, and is ever widening. The liberal, cliché spewing, well-heeled, Ivy-league educated politico has never been “in touch.” At least we know where the stick-up-the-ass, war-mongering conservative stands. He will send our sons and daughters to war and make a fortune from the bodies of the working class.

If you are not pissed off, you should be. As long as the lobbyist paid heros in Washington can maintain the flag-waving, and tension among the ethnic and working classes, nothing much will change for the better. The first words of truth have emerged, and maybe there is some hope for those who do the work. But I am cynical, and I believe that what CNN, FOX and MSNBC tells the people to believe is what they will believe.

Can a Computer Write Better Than You?

I read in The New York Times today (April 14, 2008) that a San Diego man has written more than 200,000 books, with the aid of computers. Most of these are highly selective esoteric works that only sell a few copies. Philip M. Parker has declared himself the most published author in history.

Mr. Parker has programmers who develop algorithms to amalgamate information, and then write it to a Word document. His automated method does the research, and compiles the work using 60 to 70 computers.  Assuming the words are in order, the information is dispensed accurately, we come to the the big question. Will computer generated writing replace human writing?

As a point of departure, consider what is written on blogs. The blogs that receive the most attention are almost always “how to” articles. And the current attention grabbers are 23 ways to do (insert a noun or phrase). Those who write these articles research the information, and bam, 15 ways/tips/predictions or methods to accomplish any given task. These tips, ways and methods are not usually generated out of the author’s head; they are researched and put together (amalgamated) from various sources. In fact, I don’t see a lot of creativity here, except to think of what to put together.

News stories are not much more than facts put together in a reader friendly way. Hell, we don’t read anyway; we skim for facts. For years we have used boilerplate text, and template plots for novels. Mr. Parker is in the process of producing romance novels generated by computer algorithms. From “how to” to sitcoms to rudimentary novels is not a great leap. How do you know what you are reading on any web site is generated by a human? In fact, you don’t.

Years ago I bought a little book called “The Thirty-six Dramatic Situations” by Georges Polti. The first paragraph on the back cover sums up the gist of the book.
“It has long been known to the writing profession that there are no new plots…that all the conceivable situations have been used, and that all modern plots are but variations and adaptations of certain original situations.” This was written in 1921 - my copy is a 1977 publication.

This does not mean that creativity in writing does not exist. Of course it does. You can paint a rose an infinite number of ways, even though a rose by any other name is still a rose. Therein lies creativity. But we need to separate “15 ways to paint a rose” written on a blog somewhere from your way of seeing a rose, which may be different than any way the rose has been portrayed before.

I see computer generated text as prevalent as grass in the future. You plug in statistics, facts and parameters and a program will research and write a perfectly good article. a perfectly good article… a perfectly good article…

People, Pets and Paradox

When the dog died he and his wife shut themselves off from the world, refused to take phone calls, email, or have any human contact for two weeks. Earlier that year, when his mother died, he was somewhat upset, but remarked that, “well, we all die… .” The year prior to that, when his sister died, he didn’t say much of anything I can remember.

This is all true, and from a man I’ve known since childhood. I am not insensitive to pet owners; in fact, I have owned a dog or two in my life, and loved them. Note I used the word owned. The dogs were mine, in the sense that they are property much like livestock on a farm. Having grown up on a farm, I will never understand the mind-set of those who place more value on animal than human life.

In my experience, people who do this have a problem with people, and the company of people, and have other issues in their lives that make them somewhat of a social misfit. Picture the lonely single woman with six cats and a house that stinks of cat urine. I have known several women like this. They let the world know how they hate men because they have had hateful experiences with men. Virtually all the women I’ve know like this would love to find a man who treated them as they want to be treated. I admit, there are some lousy bastards in the world who don’t deserve to lick the shoes of some very good women. There are some women who don’t deserve a good man as well. But this is not about men vs women - that is only one example.

It is difficult for some sensitive souls to bear the burden of their less than perfect fellow human beings. I make no pretense of providing advise on psychology, but some things are apparent. If you interact with people, they will disagree with you. They will contradict, argue, and not allow you to control them. They will not always conform to your way. Other people are always the source of greatest stress in your life. Animals only require moderate attention, never disagree, argue or fuss with you. You control them, and you mold them to your way.

There is a joke going around the web now that sums this up:

Who’s your best friend, your dog or your wife? Try this experiment.
Put your dog and your wife in the trunk of the car for an hour.
When you open the trunk, see which one is really happy to see you.

I don’t claim to be a “people person” any more than an animal rights activist. In fact, I like being alone, but not as a way of life. Human misery in the world bothers me, and I try not to add to anyone’s misery. I would never elevate an animal’s life above human life. On the other hand, I’ve known some low down sons-a-bitches who who don’t care for any living thing, and I can say with certainty the world is better without them. History is filed with more assholes than saints, and human history is bloody, sad and dreary.

Americans are a strange mixture of pathos and resplendency.  Most of us eat meat, but are repulsed by the idea of killing animals. Many of us are cruel to our fellow beings, but all heart to the cat or dog living with us. While homeless people lay in our streets, Americans spent $40 billion on pet luxuries in 2007.

A few weeks ago I happened to meet an old friend, someone I hadn’t seen for more than 10 years. The last time I saw her, around 1996, she was 34 years old, her clock was ticking, and she wanted a baby. She told me she was married in 1998, we exchanged other life events, and I asked if she had children. With a hint of sadness she told me no, that had not happened, and of course I didn’t pursue this personal issue. But suddenly her face brightened, and she said, “But we have our cats, and that keeps me busy.”

How sad it is that she will never understand the difference between having a baby (and all that goes with this incredible responsibility) and having pets. Of course I understand the substitution factor, a way for her to have some living thing in her life. But she has no point of reference, no way to contrast the vast anomaly that is her life as a human and her life as a cat.